| Discussion with a liberal: Part III |
|
|
|
| Written by Cerebral Debris | |||
| Tuesday, 09 September 2008 00:00 | |||
|
So in this 3rd part LF decides to get insulting. At one point throughout these exchanges I was tempted to think that sometimes it was LF writing and sometimes someone else. Mainly because of inconsistencies in the argument, but mostly because in some of his replies the grammar improved and the spelling was better. Some of his replies just felt like someone else writing them. First of all, my original intent was to further discuss our political views at some point. It's a subject that I'm quite addicted to. But the religious aspect has overshadowed the issue and gone a little wayward. Oh, well. Guess it's the topic for now (= Ummm... lets see. Your making this way tooo complicated. You and I both know you don't have to be a Christian to understand the Christian religion. More specifically, I have read the Bible, I understand what's in the bible and I understand the teachings of Christ. Whom I believe is a historical figure who was a great teacher. But not the son of God.Your condescension is nauseating... ...you hint that you have the truth, yet you avoid giving any insight by using the "it's very complex" routine. If you have "the real truth", I'd think you would be ecstatic about it. Ready to shout it from the rooftops. So you're a man of science. Truth to you is only scientific. Is your extensive knowledge of science what makes you an authority on what you refer to as "the real truth"? So what's this mysterious and complex "real truth" you like to say but not expand on? You speak as though being a man of science means you've got proof that God doesn't exist. I have a brother who earned his Master's degree in biology. His research covered molecular biology, cell biology, biochemistry, evolution, etc. Guess what LF- he's also one of the most devout Christian's I know. Gee, with all that science, how can that be? I don't know what the "truth" is. And I'm okay with it. You don't so you convince yourself you do. You left out 2 words that I wrote- personal manifestation. Call me wacky. Call me a zealot. Call me whatever you want. It won't be the first time and certainly not the last. The words mean what they mean, and it has nothing to do with a simple feeling. Take from it what you will. I believe in absolute truth, but I understand I still have much too much to learn to judge others. You judge others all the time LF. You've judged Christian's as idiots who don't know why they believe what they believe. You've also made other judgements on others that contradict that statement. I'll go over that more in a few minutes. My personal faith is what it is. It can't be swayed, altered or manipulated. You wouldn't understand it because, well, you don't share the same faith I do. It's not something I can convince you of, and frankly have no desire to convince you of. I said as much in the last e-mail. Remember, it wasn't me who shoved my beliefs in your face. It was you who insulted, attacked and undermined my beliefs. I've never once told that you should be a certain way or that you have to believe in certain things. You asked what I believe and I told you. When it comes to believing in god or not you have to be direct. I told you why I don't believe. That's all. I don't agree with your belief in man-god but whatever floats your boat. (And yes I can be judgmental at times I'm trying not to be. I'm not perfect!) That's one of the great beauties about our Constitution. Our freedom of religion is one of it's greatest guarantees. I'm free to believe what I believe and you are free to not believe what I believe. I love this country and I believe very strongly in the Ideals of this country. Again LF. The intention was never to prove anything. Nor is it the desire to. You've made a mockery of my beliefs. Your request, if it could be met as requested, is insincere. Don't ask me for proof of God. Ask God. Or, just continue on with your fruitless quest for the knowledge that God doesn't exist. Yeah, I believe that man was "created in God's image". Because I believe the Bible. Why do I believe the Bible ... or according to you... fairy tales? Faith. Why do I believe in God? Personal manifestation and faith. No, it wasn't a little tickly feeling in my tummy or a feeling of any kind. If you've never experienced it, then I'm sorry. It's only something you know when it happens to you personally. "Faith and Personal manifestation... can't explain it...." Sounds neato! In other word, it's a matter of faith and that's all. You stated in the last e-mail that your "faith continues to evolve". I asked you the question "your faith in what?" Nope. Don't know. And I'm okay with that... scary, maybe sometimes, but also very exciting. Life and the Universe is a mystery full of beauty. I'm sorry you can't understand my belief. "If you've never experienced it then I'm sorry." You leave the question of are you an atheist? Or are you an agnostic? Agnostic, I suppose. As I said God could exist but I don't have any evidence. It's not an argument, it's a statement. A testimony. How can you expect to ever experience it when you go out of your way to degrade it? How can you expect manifestation from God when all you do is disrespect and mock Him? >I don't expect manifestations from god. Again. It was never my intention to prove anything to you as far as my beliefs go. If you'd focused on the real question it was a legitimate one that had nothing to do with proving anything to you; but had everything to do with the discussion at hand. I questioned your credibility on the subject of preaching Christianity and at the same time rejecting it. That pissed you off and you replied that 'your faith and beliefs are no one's business but your own'... yet you made my beliefs your business. I can at least say that I'm honest about what I believe, and am not afraid or ashamed to admit it. You on the other hand have given nothing but vague statements about science and being "one in the universe". You've offered nothing of substance. You offer zero insight. Just broad statements and mockeries.
The science of what? Using theories of monkeys as our ancestors. Wow. That's enlightening. Or was it the big bang theory? Or maybe it was just the science of whatever might work well with your anti-Christian agenda. I wouldn't know. You make nothing but talking points with no substance.
I've never said that. You mentioned that Christian's reject science. Nope, that's not true. That's just another liberal myth. I believe that science has helped us to greatly expand our knowledge about God's great creation.
We use science to help us understand and learn more about the workings of God's creation while you and other anti-Christians use science to try and disprove Christianity.
What we reject are theories being presented in such a one sided manner. The theory of evolution has been accepted into our schools and taught for years. It's been presented without any opposing view or possibility such as creationism or intelligent design. Oh, mention that and the anti-Christian groups hiss and scream in full blown rejection.
Oh, and you may be asking why I called you condescending earlier. I'll tell you why even if you weren't wondering. You are making the arrogant mistake of assuming that anyone who is Christian must be completely ignorant about science. I don't think you are totally ignorant of science but you reject what doesn't jive with your faith and that's not right -- The Scientific consensus is not to be challenged lightly. And just because some wacko published some wacko article in a wacko magazine or journal doesn't mean you should take it for proof. It should appear in a scientific journal - a real one. (trying to head off you sending me wacko articles by wacko authors in wacko journals/magazines You're assuming that what you know about science is so much more than any fairy tale believing Christian would know. If you want to talk science with me LF, go right ahead. Don't ever assume that I'm incapable of understanding any subject you might want to cover. My ability to seek out and obtain and retain knowledge is something that I'm very proud of. I consider it a gift from God and work very hard daily to improve on it a little more. I'm sure you know some science. You're a smart guy, no denying. The same way you've jumped to the conclusion that God doesn't exist? Oh, that's right. You know "the real truth". Yet it's too complex for us dumb Christian's, right?
First of all, Karl Marx was a communist who also liked to mock religion with lines like "religion is the opiate of the masses". His words mean nothing to me. The socialist agenda that the left is hellbent on pushing us into is nothing less than a segue into full-blown communism. Something for which I have zero tolerance. If you'd like to discuss that further I've got a whole lot more to say on the subject. Secondly, if the Bible is nothing more than a fairy tale, then how could you possibly have learned from it? Stick with me for a minute and read through your next statement... I'm familiar with Karl Marx. I'm a sociology/criminology/political science major. And yes he was the author of the Communist Manifesto. And he made many good points regarding the fallibility of capitalism. Captialism is good but not above reproach like some believe. It's not divinely inspired. It has to be regulated....You've said it's a fairy tale. If it isn't true, then no one is bound by it's teachings other than its being anything more than simply good ideas to live by. Don't ask us "what would Jesus do?", and at the same time laugh at us for believing in "fairy tales". Yes, teachings from a great man not the Son of God. I know the teachings of Jesus and I don't think it out of bounds to engage people regarding their faith. It's my right to have an opinion. What of it? Here are 2 words for you: George Bush... You try and tell people about love, peace and ask WWJD? , and all the while you spew your own hate and venom against the leaders of your own country. The mere mention of the name George Bush, or Dick Cheney will send you into fits of your own hate speech, yet you want to preach to everyone else about love, peace and repect for ALL? Give me a break LF! Your do as I say, not as I do hypocrisy is maddening. So don't come to me preaching love, patience, understanding, respect and all that when you spread plenty of your own hate around every chance you get. I choose to speak out for the least of these. You can protect the powerful all you want. I prefer to serve those without means and power. People are living in squalor, being shot in the streets, have no food to eat, and republicans don't give a damn!I think you could ask yourself that same question. Aside from that, once again, that last line is a good starter for another exchange. I serve others everyday. I'm filled with empathy and love for all life. It's my occupation and my passion. I make no distinctions based on faith, religion, color, nationality, sexuality, or anything... I believe it's my calling to serve. After all:
Set as favorite
Bookmark
Email this
Hits: 1754 Trackback(0)
Comments (0)
![]() Write comment
|
|||
| Last Updated on Tuesday, 09 September 2008 09:29 |





